This is cvs.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.5 from cvs.texinfo. INFO-DIR-SECTION GNU Packages START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY * CVS: (cvs). Concurrent Versions System END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY INFO-DIR-SECTION Individual utilities START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY * cvs: (cvs)CVS commands. Concurrent Versions System END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY  File: cvs.info, Node: Recursive behavior, Next: Adding and removing, Prev: Branching and merging, Up: Top Recursive behavior ****************** Almost all of the subcommands of CVS work recursively when you specify a directory as an argument. For instance, consider this directory structure: `$HOME' | +--tc | | +--CVS | (internal CVS files) +--Makefile +--backend.c +--driver.c +--frontend.c +--parser.c +--man | | | +--CVS | | (internal CVS files) | +--tc.1 | +--testing | +--CVS | (internal CVS files) +--testpgm.t +--test2.t If `tc' is the current working directory, the following is true: * `cvs update testing' is equivalent to cvs update testing/testpgm.t testing/test2.t * `cvs update testing man' updates all files in the subdirectories * `cvs update .' or just `cvs update' updates all files in the `tc' directory If no arguments are given to `update' it will update all files in the current working directory and all its subdirectories. In other words, `.' is a default argument to `update'. This is also true for most of the CVS subcommands, not only the `update' command. The recursive behavior of the CVS subcommands can be turned off with the `-l' option. Conversely, the `-R' option can be used to force recursion if `-l' is specified in `~/.cvsrc' (*note ~/.cvsrc::). $ cvs update -l # Don't update files in subdirectories  File: cvs.info, Node: Adding and removing, Next: History browsing, Prev: Recursive behavior, Up: Top Adding, removing, and renaming files and directories **************************************************** In the course of a project, one will often add new files. Likewise with removing or renaming, or with directories. The general concept to keep in mind in all these cases is that instead of making an irreversible change you want CVS to record the fact that a change has taken place, just as with modifying an existing file. The exact mechanisms to do this in CVS vary depending on the situation. * Menu: * Adding files:: Adding files * Removing files:: Removing files * Removing directories:: Removing directories * Moving files:: Moving and renaming files * Moving directories:: Moving and renaming directories  File: cvs.info, Node: Adding files, Next: Removing files, Up: Adding and removing Adding files to a directory =========================== To add a new file to a directory, follow these steps. * You must have a working copy of the directory. *Note Getting the source::. * Create the new file inside your working copy of the directory. * Use `cvs add FILENAME' to tell CVS that you want to version control the file. If the file contains binary data, specify `-kb' (*note Binary files::). * Use `cvs commit FILENAME' to actually check in the file into the repository. Other developers cannot see the file until you perform this step. You can also use the `add' command to add a new directory. Unlike most other commands, the `add' command is not recursive. You have to expcicitly name files and directories that you wish to add to the repository. However, each directory will need to be added separately before you will be able to add new files to those directories. $ mkdir -p foo/bar $ cp ~/myfile foo/bar/myfile $ cvs add foo foo/bar $ cvs add foo/bar/myfile - Command: cvs add [`-k' kflag] [`-m' message] files ... Schedule FILES to be added to the repository. The files or directories specified with `add' must already exist in the current directory. To add a whole new directory hierarchy to the source repository (for example, files received from a third-party vendor), use the `import' command instead. *Note import::. The added files are not placed in the source repository until you use `commit' to make the change permanent. Doing an `add' on a file that was removed with the `remove' command will undo the effect of the `remove', unless a `commit' command intervened. *Note Removing files::, for an example. The `-k' option specifies the default way that this file will be checked out; for more information see *Note Substitution modes::. The `-m' option specifies a description for the file. This description appears in the history log (if it is enabled, *note history file::). It will also be saved in the version history inside the repository when the file is committed. The `log' command displays this description. The description can be changed using `admin -t'. *Note admin::. If you omit the `-m DESCRIPTION' flag, an empty string will be used. You will not be prompted for a description. For example, the following commands add the file `backend.c' to the repository: $ cvs add backend.c $ cvs commit -m "Early version. Not yet compilable." backend.c When you add a file it is added only on the branch which you are working on (*note Branching and merging::). You can later merge the additions to another branch if you want (*note Merging adds and removals::).  File: cvs.info, Node: Removing files, Next: Removing directories, Prev: Adding files, Up: Adding and removing Removing files ============== Directories change. New files are added, and old files disappear. Still, you want to be able to retrieve an exact copy of old releases. Here is what you can do to remove a file, but remain able to retrieve old revisions: * Make sure that you have not made any uncommitted modifications to the file. *Note Viewing differences::, for one way to do that. You can also use the `status' or `update' command. If you remove the file without committing your changes, you will of course not be able to retrieve the file as it was immediately before you deleted it. * Remove the file from your working copy of the directory. You can for instance use `rm'. * Use `cvs remove FILENAME' to tell CVS that you really want to delete the file. * Use `cvs commit FILENAME' to actually perform the removal of the file from the repository. When you commit the removal of the file, CVS records the fact that the file no longer exists. It is possible for a file to exist on only some branches and not on others, or to re-add another file with the same name later. CVS will correctly create or not create the file, based on the `-r' and `-D' options specified to `checkout' or `update'. - Command: cvs remove [options] files ... Schedule file(s) to be removed from the repository (files which have not already been removed from the working directory are not processed). This command does not actually remove the file from the repository until you commit the removal. For a full list of options, see *Note Invoking CVS::. Here is an example of removing several files: $ cd test $ rm *.c $ cvs remove cvs remove: Removing . cvs remove: scheduling a.c for removal cvs remove: scheduling b.c for removal cvs remove: use 'cvs commit' to remove these files permanently $ cvs ci -m "Removed unneeded files" cvs commit: Examining . cvs commit: Committing . As a convenience you can remove the file and `cvs remove' it in one step, by specifying the `-f' option. For example, the above example could also be done like this: $ cd test $ cvs remove -f *.c cvs remove: scheduling a.c for removal cvs remove: scheduling b.c for removal cvs remove: use 'cvs commit' to remove these files permanently $ cvs ci -m "Removed unneeded files" cvs commit: Examining . cvs commit: Committing . If you execute `remove' for a file, and then change your mind before you commit, you can undo the `remove' with an `add' command. $ ls CVS ja.h oj.c $ rm oj.c $ cvs remove oj.c cvs remove: scheduling oj.c for removal cvs remove: use 'cvs commit' to remove this file permanently $ cvs add oj.c U oj.c cvs add: oj.c, version 1.1.1.1, resurrected If you realize your mistake before you run the `remove' command you can use `update' to resurrect the file: $ rm oj.c $ cvs update oj.c cvs update: warning: oj.c was lost U oj.c When you remove a file it is removed only on the branch which you are working on (*note Branching and merging::). You can later merge the removals to another branch if you want (*note Merging adds and removals::).  File: cvs.info, Node: Removing directories, Next: Moving files, Prev: Removing files, Up: Adding and removing Removing directories ==================== In concept removing directories is somewhat similar to removing files--you want the directory to not exist in your current working directories, but you also want to be able to retrieve old releases in which the directory existed. The way that you remove a directory is to remove all the files in it. You don't remove the directory itself; there is no way to do that. Instead you specify the `-P' option to `cvs update' or `cvs checkout', which will cause CVS to remove empty directories from working directories. (Note that `cvs export' always removes empty directories.) Probably the best way to do this is to always specify `-P'; if you want an empty directory then put a dummy file (for example `.keepme') in it to prevent `-P' from removing it. Note that `-P' is implied by the `-r' or `-D' options of `checkout'. This way CVS will be able to correctly create the directory or not depending on whether the particular version you are checking out contains any files in that directory.  File: cvs.info, Node: Moving files, Next: Moving directories, Prev: Removing directories, Up: Adding and removing Moving and renaming files ========================= Moving files to a different directory or renaming them is not difficult, but some of the ways in which this works may be non-obvious. (Moving or renaming a directory is even harder. *Note Moving directories::.). The examples below assume that the file OLD is renamed to NEW. * Menu: * Outside:: The normal way to Rename * Inside:: A tricky, alternative way * Rename by copying:: Another tricky, alternative way  File: cvs.info, Node: Outside, Next: Inside, Up: Moving files The Normal way to Rename ------------------------ The normal way to move a file is to copy OLD to NEW, and then issue the normal CVS commands to remove OLD from the repository, and add NEW to it. $ mv OLD NEW $ cvs remove OLD $ cvs add NEW $ cvs commit -m "Renamed OLD to NEW" OLD NEW This is the simplest way to move a file, it is not error-prone, and it preserves the history of what was done. Note that to access the history of the file you must specify the old or the new name, depending on what portion of the history you are accessing. For example, `cvs log OLD' will give the log up until the time of the rename. When NEW is committed its revision numbers will start again, usually at 1.1, so if that bothers you, use the `-r rev' option to commit. For more information see *Note Assigning revisions::.  File: cvs.info, Node: Inside, Next: Rename by copying, Prev: Outside, Up: Moving files Moving the history file ----------------------- This method is more dangerous, since it involves moving files inside the repository. Read this entire section before trying it out! $ cd $CVSROOT/DIR $ mv OLD,v NEW,v Advantages: * The log of changes is maintained intact. * The revision numbers are not affected. Disadvantages: * Old releases cannot easily be fetched from the repository. (The file will show up as NEW even in revisions from the time before it was renamed). * There is no log information of when the file was renamed. * Nasty things might happen if someone accesses the history file while you are moving it. Make sure no one else runs any of the CVS commands while you move it.  File: cvs.info, Node: Rename by copying, Prev: Inside, Up: Moving files Copying the history file ------------------------ This way also involves direct modifications to the repository. It is safe, but not without drawbacks. # Copy the RCS file inside the repository $ cd $CVSROOT/DIR $ cp OLD,v NEW,v # Remove the old file $ cd ~/DIR $ rm OLD $ cvs remove OLD $ cvs commit OLD # Remove all tags from NEW $ cvs update NEW $ cvs log NEW # Remember the non-branch tag names $ cvs tag -d TAG1 NEW $ cvs tag -d TAG2 NEW ... By removing the tags you will be able to check out old revisions. Advantages: * Checking out old revisions works correctly, as long as you use `-rTAG' and not `-DDATE' to retrieve the revisions. * The log of changes is maintained intact. * The revision numbers are not affected. Disadvantages: * You cannot easily see the history of the file across the rename.  File: cvs.info, Node: Moving directories, Prev: Moving files, Up: Adding and removing Moving and renaming directories =============================== The normal way to rename or move a directory is to rename or move each file within it as described in *Note Outside::. Then check out with the `-P' option, as described in *Note Removing directories::. If you really want to hack the repository to rename or delete a directory in the repository, you can do it like this: 1. Inform everyone who has a checked out copy of the directory that the directory will be renamed. They should commit all their changes, and remove their working copies, before you take the steps below. 2. Rename the directory inside the repository. $ cd $CVSROOT/PARENT-DIR $ mv OLD-DIR NEW-DIR 3. Fix the CVS administrative files, if necessary (for instance if you renamed an entire module). 4. Tell everyone that they can check out again and continue working. If someone had a working copy the CVS commands will cease to work for him, until he removes the directory that disappeared inside the repository. It is almost always better to move the files in the directory instead of moving the directory. If you move the directory you are unlikely to be able to retrieve old releases correctly, since they probably depend on the name of the directories.  File: cvs.info, Node: History browsing, Next: Binary files, Prev: Adding and removing, Up: Top History browsing **************** Once you have used CVS to store a version control history--what files have changed when, how, and by whom, there are a variety of mechanisms for looking through the history. * Menu: * log messages:: Log messages * history database:: The history database * user-defined logging:: User-defined logging  File: cvs.info, Node: log messages, Next: history database, Up: History browsing Log messages ============ Whenever you commit a file you specify a log message. To look through the log messages which have been specified for every revision which has been committed, use the `cvs log' command (*note log::).  File: cvs.info, Node: history database, Next: user-defined logging, Prev: log messages, Up: History browsing The history database ==================== You can use the history file (*note history file::) to log various CVS actions. To retrieve the information from the history file, use the `cvs history' command (*note history::). Note: you can control what is logged to this file by using the `LogHistory' keyword in the `CVSROOT/config' file (*note config::).  File: cvs.info, Node: user-defined logging, Prev: history database, Up: History browsing User-defined logging ==================== You can customize CVS to log various kinds of actions, in whatever manner you choose. These mechanisms operate by executing a script at various times. The script might append a message to a file listing the information and the programmer who created it, or send mail to a group of developers, or, perhaps, post a message to a particular newsgroup. To log commits, use the `loginfo' file (*note loginfo::). To log tags, use the `taginfo' file (*note taginfo::). To log commits, checkouts, exports, and tags, respectively, you can also use the `-i', `-o', `-e', and `-t' options in the modules file. For a more flexible way of giving notifications to various users, which requires less in the way of keeping centralized scripts up to date, use the `cvs watch add' command (*note Getting Notified::); this command is useful even if you are not using `cvs watch on'.  File: cvs.info, Node: Binary files, Next: Multiple developers, Prev: History browsing, Up: Top Handling binary files ********************* The most common use for CVS is to store text files. With text files, CVS can merge revisions, display the differences between revisions in a human-visible fashion, and other such operations. However, if you are willing to give up a few of these abilities, CVS can store binary files. For example, one might store a web site in CVS including both text files and binary images. * Menu: * Binary why:: More details on issues with binary files * Binary howto:: How to store them  File: cvs.info, Node: Binary why, Next: Binary howto, Up: Binary files The issues with binary files ============================ While the need to manage binary files may seem obvious if the files that you customarily work with are binary, putting them into version control does present some additional issues. One basic function of version control is to show the differences between two revisions. For example, if someone else checked in a new version of a file, you may wish to look at what they changed and determine whether their changes are good. For text files, CVS provides this functionality via the `cvs diff' command. For binary files, it may be possible to extract the two revisions and then compare them with a tool external to CVS (for example, word processing software often has such a feature). If there is no such tool, one must track changes via other mechanisms, such as urging people to write good log messages, and hoping that the changes they actually made were the changes that they intended to make. Another ability of a version control system is the ability to merge two revisions. For CVS this happens in two contexts. The first is when users make changes in separate working directories (*note Multiple developers::). The second is when one merges explicitly with the `update -j' command (*note Branching and merging::). In the case of text files, CVS can merge changes made independently, and signal a conflict if the changes conflict. With binary files, the best that CVS can do is present the two different copies of the file, and leave it to the user to resolve the conflict. The user may choose one copy or the other, or may run an external merge tool which knows about that particular file format, if one exists. Note that having the user merge relies primarily on the user to not accidentally omit some changes, and thus is potentially error prone. If this process is thought to be undesirable, the best choice may be to avoid merging. To avoid the merges that result from separate working directories, see the discussion of reserved checkouts (file locking) in *Note Multiple developers::. To avoid the merges resulting from branches, restrict use of branches.  File: cvs.info, Node: Binary howto, Prev: Binary why, Up: Binary files How to store binary files ========================= There are two issues with using CVS to store binary files. The first is that CVS by default converts line endings between the canonical form in which they are stored in the repository (linefeed only), and the form appropriate to the operating system in use on the client (for example, carriage return followed by line feed for Windows NT). The second is that a binary file might happen to contain data which looks like a keyword (*note Keyword substitution::), so keyword expansion must be turned off. The `-kb' option available with some CVS commands insures that neither line ending conversion nor keyword expansion will be done. Here is an example of how you can create a new file using the `-kb' flag: $ echo '$Id$' > kotest $ cvs add -kb -m"A test file" kotest $ cvs ci -m"First checkin; contains a keyword" kotest If a file accidentally gets added without `-kb', one can use the `cvs admin' command to recover. For example: $ echo '$Id$' > kotest $ cvs add -m"A test file" kotest $ cvs ci -m"First checkin; contains a keyword" kotest $ cvs admin -kb kotest $ cvs update -A kotest # For non-unix systems: # Copy in a good copy of the file from outside CVS $ cvs commit -m "make it binary" kotest When you check in the file `kotest' the file is not preserved as a binary file, because you did not check it in as a binary file. The `cvs admin -kb' command sets the default keyword substitution method for this file, but it does not alter the working copy of the file that you have. If you need to cope with line endings (that is, you are using CVS on a non-unix system), then you need to check in a new copy of the file, as shown by the `cvs commit' command above. On unix, the `cvs update -A' command suffices. (Note that you can use `cvs log' to determine the default keyword substitution method for a file and `cvs status' to determine the keyword substitution method for a working copy.) However, in using `cvs admin -k' to change the keyword expansion, be aware that the keyword expansion mode is not version controlled. This means that, for example, that if you have a text file in old releases, and a binary file with the same name in new releases, CVS provides no way to check out the file in text or binary mode depending on what version you are checking out. There is no good workaround for this problem. You can also set a default for whether `cvs add' and `cvs import' treat a file as binary based on its name; for example you could say that files who names end in `.exe' are binary. *Note Wrappers::. There is currently no way to have CVS detect whether a file is binary based on its contents. The main difficulty with designing such a feature is that it is not clear how to distinguish between binary and non-binary files, and the rules to apply would vary considerably with the operating system.  File: cvs.info, Node: Multiple developers, Next: Revision management, Prev: Binary files, Up: Top Multiple developers ******************* When more than one person works on a software project things often get complicated. Often, two people try to edit the same file simultaneously. One solution, known as "file locking" or "reserved checkouts", is to allow only one person to edit each file at a time. This is the only solution with some version control systems, including RCS and SCCS. Currently the usual way to get reserved checkouts with CVS is the `cvs admin -l' command (*note admin options::). This is not as nicely integrated into CVS as the watch features, described below, but it seems that most people with a need for reserved checkouts find it adequate. It also may be possible to use the watches features described below, together with suitable procedures (not enforced by software), to avoid having two people edit at the same time. The default model with CVS is known as "unreserved checkouts". In this model, developers can edit their own "working copy" of a file simultaneously. The first person that commits his changes has no automatic way of knowing that another has started to edit it. Others will get an error message when they try to commit the file. They must then use CVS commands to bring their working copy up to date with the repository revision. This process is almost automatic. CVS also supports mechanisms which facilitate various kinds of communication, without actually enforcing rules like reserved checkouts do. The rest of this chapter describes how these various models work, and some of the issues involved in choosing between them. * Menu: * File status:: A file can be in several states * Updating a file:: Bringing a file up-to-date * Conflicts example:: An informative example * Informing others:: To cooperate you must inform * Concurrency:: Simultaneous repository access * Watches:: Mechanisms to track who is editing files * Choosing a model:: Reserved or unreserved checkouts?  File: cvs.info, Node: File status, Next: Updating a file, Up: Multiple developers File status =========== Based on what operations you have performed on a checked out file, and what operations others have performed to that file in the repository, one can classify a file in a number of states. The states, as reported by the `status' command, are: Up-to-date The file is identical with the latest revision in the repository for the branch in use. Locally Modified You have edited the file, and not yet committed your changes. Locally Added You have added the file with `add', and not yet committed your changes. Locally Removed You have removed the file with `remove', and not yet committed your changes. Needs Checkout Someone else has committed a newer revision to the repository. The name is slightly misleading; you will ordinarily use `update' rather than `checkout' to get that newer revision. Needs Patch Like Needs Checkout, but the CVS server will send a patch rather than the entire file. Sending a patch or sending an entire file accomplishes the same thing. Needs Merge Someone else has committed a newer revision to the repository, and you have also made modifications to the file. Unresolved Conflict A file with the same name as this new file has been added to the repository from a second workspace. This file will need to be moved out of the way to allow an `update' to complete. File had conflicts on merge This is like Locally Modified, except that a previous `update' command gave a conflict. If you have not already done so, you need to resolve the conflict as described in *Note Conflicts example::. Unknown CVS doesn't know anything about this file. For example, you have created a new file and have not run `add'. To help clarify the file status, `status' also reports the `Working revision' which is the revision that the file in the working directory derives from, and the `Repository revision' which is the latest revision in the repository for the branch in use. The options to `status' are listed in *Note Invoking CVS::. For information on its `Sticky tag' and `Sticky date' output, see *Note Sticky tags::. For information on its `Sticky options' output, see the `-k' option in *Note update options::. You can think of the `status' and `update' commands as somewhat complementary. You use `update' to bring your files up to date, and you can use `status' to give you some idea of what an `update' would do (of course, the state of the repository might change before you actually run `update'). In fact, if you want a command to display file status in a more brief format than is displayed by the `status' command, you can invoke $ cvs -n -q update The `-n' option means to not actually do the update, but merely to display statuses; the `-q' option avoids printing the name of each directory. For more information on the `update' command, and these options, see *Note Invoking CVS::.  File: cvs.info, Node: Updating a file, Next: Conflicts example, Prev: File status, Up: Multiple developers Bringing a file up to date ========================== When you want to update or merge a file, use the `update' command. For files that are not up to date this is roughly equivalent to a `checkout' command: the newest revision of the file is extracted from the repository and put in your working directory. Your modifications to a file are never lost when you use `update'. If no newer revision exists, running `update' has no effect. If you have edited the file, and a newer revision is available, CVS will merge all changes into your working copy. For instance, imagine that you checked out revision 1.4 and started editing it. In the meantime someone else committed revision 1.5, and shortly after that revision 1.6. If you run `update' on the file now, CVS will incorporate all changes between revision 1.4 and 1.6 into your file. If any of the changes between 1.4 and 1.6 were made too close to any of the changes you have made, an "overlap" occurs. In such cases a warning is printed, and the resulting file includes both versions of the lines that overlap, delimited by special markers. *Note update::, for a complete description of the `update' command.  File: cvs.info, Node: Conflicts example, Next: Informing others, Prev: Updating a file, Up: Multiple developers Conflicts example ================= Suppose revision 1.4 of `driver.c' contains this: #include void main() { parse(); if (nerr == 0) gencode(); else fprintf(stderr, "No code generated.\n"); exit(nerr == 0 ? 0 : 1); } Revision 1.6 of `driver.c' contains this: #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { parse(); if (argc != 1) { fprintf(stderr, "tc: No args expected.\n"); exit(1); } if (nerr == 0) gencode(); else fprintf(stderr, "No code generated.\n"); exit(!!nerr); } Your working copy of `driver.c', based on revision 1.4, contains this before you run `cvs update': #include #include void main() { init_scanner(); parse(); if (nerr == 0) gencode(); else fprintf(stderr, "No code generated.\n"); exit(nerr == 0 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE); } You run `cvs update': $ cvs update driver.c RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/yoyodyne/tc/driver.c,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.6 Merging differences between 1.4 and 1.6 into driver.c rcsmerge warning: overlaps during merge cvs update: conflicts found in driver.c C driver.c CVS tells you that there were some conflicts. Your original working file is saved unmodified in `.#driver.c.1.4'. The new version of `driver.c' contains this: #include #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { init_scanner(); parse(); if (argc != 1) { fprintf(stderr, "tc: No args expected.\n"); exit(1); } if (nerr == 0) gencode(); else fprintf(stderr, "No code generated.\n"); <<<<<<< driver.c exit(nerr == 0 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE); ======= exit(!!nerr); >>>>>>> 1.6 } Note how all non-overlapping modifications are incorporated in your working copy, and that the overlapping section is clearly marked with `<<<<<<<', `=======' and `>>>>>>>'. You resolve the conflict by editing the file, removing the markers and the erroneous line. Suppose you end up with this file: #include #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { init_scanner(); parse(); if (argc != 1) { fprintf(stderr, "tc: No args expected.\n"); exit(1); } if (nerr == 0) gencode(); else fprintf(stderr, "No code generated.\n"); exit(nerr == 0 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE); } You can now go ahead and commit this as revision 1.7. $ cvs commit -m "Initialize scanner. Use symbolic exit values." driver.c Checking in driver.c; /usr/local/cvsroot/yoyodyne/tc/driver.c,v <-- driver.c new revision: 1.7; previous revision: 1.6 done For your protection, CVS will refuse to check in a file if a conflict occurred and you have not resolved the conflict. Currently to resolve a conflict, you must change the timestamp on the file. In previous versions of CVS, you also needed to insure that the file contains no conflict markers. Because your file may legitimately contain conflict markers (that is, occurrences of `>>>>>>> ' at the start of a line that don't mark a conflict), the current version of CVS will print a warning and proceed to check in the file. If you use release 1.04 or later of pcl-cvs (a GNU Emacs front-end for CVS) you can use an Emacs package called emerge to help you resolve conflicts. See the documentation for pcl-cvs.  File: cvs.info, Node: Informing others, Next: Concurrency, Prev: Conflicts example, Up: Multiple developers Informing others about commits ============================== It is often useful to inform others when you commit a new revision of a file. The `-i' option of the `modules' file, or the `loginfo' file, can be used to automate this process. *Note modules::. *Note loginfo::. You can use these features of CVS to, for instance, instruct CVS to mail a message to all developers, or post a message to a local newsgroup.  File: cvs.info, Node: Concurrency, Next: Watches, Prev: Informing others, Up: Multiple developers Several developers simultaneously attempting to run CVS ======================================================= If several developers try to run CVS at the same time, one may get the following message: [11:43:23] waiting for bach's lock in /usr/local/cvsroot/foo CVS will try again every 30 seconds, and either continue with the operation or print the message again, if it still needs to wait. If a lock seems to stick around for an undue amount of time, find the person holding the lock and ask them about the cvs command they are running. If they aren't running a cvs command, look in the repository directory mentioned in the message and remove files which they own whose names start with `#cvs.rfl', `#cvs.wfl', or `#cvs.lock'. Note that these locks are to protect CVS's internal data structures and have no relationship to the word "lock" in the sense used by RCS--which refers to reserved checkouts (*note Multiple developers::). Any number of people can be reading from a given repository at a time; only when someone is writing do the locks prevent other people from reading or writing. One might hope for the following property: If someone commits some changes in one cvs command, then an update by someone else will either get all the changes, or none of them. but CVS does _not_ have this property. For example, given the files a/one.c a/two.c b/three.c b/four.c if someone runs cvs ci a/two.c b/three.c and someone else runs `cvs update' at the same time, the person running `update' might get only the change to `b/three.c' and not the change to `a/two.c'.  File: cvs.info, Node: Watches, Next: Choosing a model, Prev: Concurrency, Up: Multiple developers Mechanisms to track who is editing files ======================================== For many groups, use of CVS in its default mode is perfectly satisfactory. Users may sometimes go to check in a modification only to find that another modification has intervened, but they deal with it and proceed with their check in. Other groups prefer to be able to know who is editing what files, so that if two people try to edit the same file they can choose to talk about who is doing what when rather than be surprised at check in time. The features in this section allow such coordination, while retaining the ability of two developers to edit the same file at the same time. For maximum benefit developers should use `cvs edit' (not `chmod') to make files read-write to edit them, and `cvs release' (not `rm') to discard a working directory which is no longer in use, but CVS is not able to enforce this behavior. * Menu: * Setting a watch:: Telling CVS to watch certain files * Getting Notified:: Telling CVS to notify you * Editing files:: How to edit a file which is being watched * Watch information:: Information about who is watching and editing * Watches Compatibility:: Watches interact poorly with CVS 1.6 or earlier  File: cvs.info, Node: Setting a watch, Next: Getting Notified, Up: Watches Telling CVS to watch certain files ---------------------------------- To enable the watch features, you first specify that certain files are to be watched. - Command: cvs watch on [`-lR'] [FILES]... Specify that developers should run `cvs edit' before editing FILES. CVS will create working copies of FILES read-only, to remind developers to run the `cvs edit' command before working on them. If FILES includes the name of a directory, CVS arranges to watch all files added to the corresponding repository directory, and sets a default for files added in the future; this allows the user to set notification policies on a per-directory basis. The contents of the directory are processed recursively, unless the `-l' option is given. The `-R' option can be used to force recursion if the `-l' option is set in `~/.cvsrc' (*note ~/.cvsrc::). If FILES is omitted, it defaults to the current directory. - Command: cvs watch off [`-lR'] [FILES]... Do not create FILES read-only on checkout; thus, developers will not be reminded to use `cvs edit' and `cvs unedit'. The FILES and options are processed as for `cvs watch on'.  File: cvs.info, Node: Getting Notified, Next: Editing files, Prev: Setting a watch, Up: Watches Telling CVS to notify you ------------------------- You can tell CVS that you want to receive notifications about various actions taken on a file. You can do this without using `cvs watch on' for the file, but generally you will want to use `cvs watch on', to remind developers to use the `cvs edit' command. - Command: cvs watch add [`-lR'] [`-a' ACTION]... [FILES]... Add the current user to the list of people to receive notification of work done on FILES. The `-a' option specifies what kinds of events CVS should notify the user about. ACTION is one of the following: `edit' Another user has applied the `cvs edit' command (described below) to a watched file. `commit' Another user has committed changes to one of the named FILES. `unedit' Another user has abandoned editing a file (other than by committing changes). They can do this in several ways, by: * applying the `cvs unedit' command (described below) to the file * applying the `cvs release' command (*note release::) to the file's parent directory (or recursively to a directory more than one level up) * deleting the file and allowing `cvs update' to recreate it `all' All of the above. `none' None of the above. (This is useful with `cvs edit', described below.) The `-a' option may appear more than once, or not at all. If omitted, the action defaults to `all'. The FILES and options are processed as for `cvs watch on'. - Command: cvs watch remove [`-lR'] [`-a' ACTION]... [FILES]... Remove a notification request established using `cvs watch add'; the arguments are the same. If the `-a' option is present, only watches for the specified actions are removed. When the conditions exist for notification, CVS calls the `notify' administrative file. Edit `notify' as one edits the other administrative files (*note Intro administrative files::). This file follows the usual conventions for administrative files (*note syntax::), where each line is a regular expression followed by a command to execute. The command should contain a single occurrence of `%s' which will be replaced by the user to notify; the rest of the information regarding the notification will be supplied to the command on standard input. The standard thing to put in the `notify' file is the single line: ALL mail %s -s "CVS notification" This causes users to be notified by electronic mail. Note that if you set this up in the straightforward way, users receive notifications on the server machine. One could of course write a `notify' script which directed notifications elsewhere, but to make this easy, CVS allows you to associate a notification address for each user. To do so create a file `users' in `CVSROOT' with a line for each user in the format USER:VALUE. Then instead of passing the name of the user to be notified to `notify', CVS will pass the VALUE (normally an email address on some other machine). CVS does not notify you for your own changes. Currently this check is done based on whether the user name of the person taking the action which triggers notification matches the user name of the person getting notification. In fact, in general, the watches features only track one edit by each user. It probably would be more useful if watches tracked each working directory separately, so this behavior might be worth changing.  File: cvs.info, Node: Editing files, Next: Watch information, Prev: Getting Notified, Up: Watches How to edit a file which is being watched ----------------------------------------- Since a file which is being watched is checked out read-only, you cannot simply edit it. To make it read-write, and inform others that you are planning to edit it, use the `cvs edit' command. Some systems call this a "checkout", but CVS uses that term for obtaining a copy of the sources (*note Getting the source::), an operation which those systems call a "get" or a "fetch". - Command: cvs edit [`-lR'] [`-a' ACTION]... [FILES]... Prepare to edit the working files FILES. CVS makes the FILES read-write, and notifies users who have requested `edit' notification for any of FILES. The `cvs edit' command accepts the same options as the `cvs watch add' command, and establishes a temporary watch for the user on FILES; CVS will remove the watch when FILES are `unedit'ed or `commit'ted. If the user does not wish to receive notifications, she should specify `-a none'. The FILES and the options are processed as for the `cvs watch' commands. Normally when you are done with a set of changes, you use the `cvs commit' command, which checks in your changes and returns the watched files to their usual read-only state. But if you instead decide to abandon your changes, or not to make any changes, you can use the `cvs unedit' command. - Command: cvs unedit [`-lR'] [FILES]... Abandon work on the working files FILES, and revert them to the repository versions on which they are based. CVS makes those FILES read-only for which users have requested notification using `cvs watch on'. CVS notifies users who have requested `unedit' notification for any of FILES. The FILES and options are processed as for the `cvs watch' commands. If watches are not in use, the `unedit' command probably does not work, and the way to revert to the repository version is with the command `cvs update -C file' (*note update::). The meaning is not precisely the same; the latter may also bring in some changes which have been made in the repository since the last time you updated. When using client/server CVS, you can use the `cvs edit' and `cvs unedit' commands even if CVS is unable to successfully communicate with the server; the notifications will be sent upon the next successful CVS command.  File: cvs.info, Node: Watch information, Next: Watches Compatibility, Prev: Editing files, Up: Watches Information about who is watching and editing --------------------------------------------- - Command: cvs watchers [`-lR'] [FILES]... List the users currently watching changes to FILES. The report includes the files being watched, and the mail address of each watcher. The FILES and options are processed as for the `cvs watch' commands. - Command: cvs editors [`-lR'] [FILES]... List the users currently working on FILES. The report includes the mail address of each user, the time when the user began working with the file, and the host and path of the working directory containing the file. The FILES and options are processed as for the `cvs watch' commands.  File: cvs.info, Node: Watches Compatibility, Prev: Watch information, Up: Watches Using watches with old versions of CVS -------------------------------------- If you use the watch features on a repository, it creates `CVS' directories in the repository and stores the information about watches in that directory. If you attempt to use CVS 1.6 or earlier with the repository, you get an error message such as the following (all on one line): cvs update: cannot open CVS/Entries for reading: No such file or directory and your operation will likely be aborted. To use the watch features, you must upgrade all copies of CVS which use that repository in local or server mode. If you cannot upgrade, use the `watch off' and `watch remove' commands to remove all watches, and that will restore the repository to a state which CVS 1.6 can cope with.  File: cvs.info, Node: Choosing a model, Prev: Watches, Up: Multiple developers Choosing between reserved or unreserved checkouts ================================================= Reserved and unreserved checkouts each have pros and cons. Let it be said that a lot of this is a matter of opinion or what works given different groups' working styles, but here is a brief description of some of the issues. There are many ways to organize a team of developers. CVS does not try to enforce a certain organization. It is a tool that can be used in several ways. Reserved checkouts can be very counter-productive. If two persons want to edit different parts of a file, there may be no reason to prevent either of them from doing so. Also, it is common for someone to take out a lock on a file, because they are planning to edit it, but then forget to release the lock. People, especially people who are familiar with reserved checkouts, often wonder how often conflicts occur if unreserved checkouts are used, and how difficult they are to resolve. The experience with many groups is that they occur rarely and usually are relatively straightforward to resolve. The rarity of serious conflicts may be surprising, until one realizes that they occur only when two developers disagree on the proper design for a given section of code; such a disagreement suggests that the team has not been communicating properly in the first place. In order to collaborate under _any_ source management regimen, developers must agree on the general design of the system; given this agreement, overlapping changes are usually straightforward to merge. In some cases unreserved checkouts are clearly inappropriate. If no merge tool exists for the kind of file you are managing (for example word processor files or files edited by Computer Aided Design programs), and it is not desirable to change to a program which uses a mergeable data format, then resolving conflicts is going to be unpleasant enough that you generally will be better off to simply avoid the conflicts instead, by using reserved checkouts. The watches features described above in *Note Watches:: can be considered to be an intermediate model between reserved checkouts and unreserved checkouts. When you go to edit a file, it is possible to find out who else is editing it. And rather than having the system simply forbid both people editing the file, it can tell you what the situation is and let you figure out whether it is a problem in that particular case or not. Therefore, for some groups it can be considered the best of both the reserved checkout and unreserved checkout worlds.  File: cvs.info, Node: Revision management, Next: Keyword substitution, Prev: Multiple developers, Up: Top Revision management ******************* If you have read this far, you probably have a pretty good grasp on what CVS can do for you. This chapter talks a little about things that you still have to decide. If you are doing development on your own using CVS you could probably skip this chapter. The questions this chapter takes up become more important when more than one person is working in a repository. * Menu: * When to commit:: Some discussion on the subject